Announcements

[Jacko_the_lad]

What's with the Mods new fancy badges?

[Envisager]

---

Jacko_the_lad wrote:
What's with the Mods new fancy badges?

---

Well spotted!

It's to help better differentiate who the forum staff are!

[Yaster]

Aye, so you'll know not to give us any lip XD

[QuietlyWrong]

I hate to be a nay-sayer... I don't hate the new pop-ups but I'd prefer them not to be there. Any chance of an option to turn them off?

[Troothpaste]

me likey

[Cimbrer]

---

Cid_Chaos wrote:

---

ytevo79 wrote:

---

chrisa3211 wrote:
What happened to the new replies counter?

---

That's what I'm missing

---

Hmm that's odd, I've still got the new replies counter but I'm now missing the total post counter.

---

Same for me, the "new posts" is still there, but I have to hover, to get the bubble and see the total number of replies. 

[Pacman_Ownage]

... Yeah...,

I totally want the new replies & total posts back, it's so much more complicated now, in a wierd way only knowing the new replies ...*

* for me...

[GraphiteGB]

---

Pacman_Ownage wrote:

... Yeah...,

I totally want the new replies & total posts back, it's so much more complicated now, in a wierd way only knowing the new replies ...*

* for me...

---

Yep its going to be to complicated for most users if they have never read a topic before to do the -1 calculation from the NEW figure to work out the number of replys to the orignial post.

Not sure why? If you have read a topic before do you need to Know how many posts you have read allready.  This is one thing on forum that never made sense to me.  

If a topic has 300 new posts thats use full as it tells you its going to take along time to catch up.

But telling you its got 300 posts and 3 are new. that means you read 297 of them. If you have read them , then why care. 

[Pacman_Ownage]

---

GraphiteGB wrote:

---

Pacman_Ownage wrote:

... Yeah...,

I totally want the new replies & total posts back, it's so much more complicated now, in a wierd way only knowing the new replies ...*

* for me...

---

Yep its going to be to complicated for most users if they have never read a topic before to do the -1 calculation from the NEW figure to work out the number of replys to the orignial post.

Not sure why? If you have read a topic before do you need to Know how many posts you have read allready.  This is one thing on forum that never made sense to me.  

If a topic has 300 new posts thats use full as it tells you its going to take along time to catch up.

But telling you its got 300 posts and 3 are new. that means you read 297 of them. If you have read them , then why care. 

---

...

Did...

Did I just get insulted?

I genuinly don't know

[nilet]

i like it good work