on 27-12-2009 04:47 AM
on 27-12-2009 04:10 PM
So saw this on Sunday.
I thought it was terrible,
Brilliant CG...but the buck stops there.
And if I was to put my opinion down
Cameron has not done a good film since T2
(titanic sucked).
Well done to the guys and gals at Weta, Lola, Framestore etc
who contributed to the amazing visuals.
But Cameron would have to be the most over rated person
in Hollywood...possibly Im being a tad harsh cos everyone
at work was like ZOMG greatest movie ever.
But sorry... nice effects dont make a good movie.
on 27-12-2009 07:27 PM
Sooo ... a bit of a 'Waterworld' then? (Nice idea, but...) I haven't seen it yet but I don't particularly go for movies that feel the need to smack you about the face with the moral of the story. Some of us are capable of rational thought.
on 27-12-2009 10:46 PM - last edited on 27-12-2009 10:47 PM
Possibly I didn't feel that disappointed because I knew nothing about the movie and hadn't been following the hype building up to it?
Whereas I was hyped (and bitterly disappointed) in King Kong after being so mad on the LOTR trilogy, and in particular Return of the King, a rare third movie in a series, that not only eclipses the first two, but doesn't bomb and scar the name of the first two... (I'm looking at you emo Spidey 3 and X-Men 3).... Oh and for hype being shattered, also add Matrix Reloaded (and Revolutions seeing as they are one giant Kill Bill movie) .... curse you Wachowski brothers.. ![]()

on 28-12-2009 02:33 AM
@ Dess yep pretty much ![]()
@ Kiwi I think I'll watch it again on a Blu Ray hire
on a tuesday when I can buy one get one free
.
So I will hire a good movie and then avatar ![]()
![]()
.
Maybe Ill enjoy it more when the hype dies down ![]()
on 28-12-2009 10:13 AM
tjohn323 wrote:So saw this on Sunday.
I thought it was terrible,
Brilliant CG...but the buck stops there.
And if I was to put my opinion down
Cameron has not done a good film since T2
(titanic sucked).
Well done to the guys and gals at Weta, Lola, Framestore etc
who contributed to the amazing visuals.
But Cameron would have to be the most over rated person
in Hollywood...possibly Im being a tad harsh cos everyone
at work was like ZOMG greatest movie ever.
But sorry... nice effects dont make a good movie.
Yeah I'll agree with that and everyone else who didn't like the story... but see this is the problem with big-selling blockbusters, they have to tone down any intellectual sides so audiences don't get scared or confused... I've come to appreciate deeper themes in movies.
When I was younger I used to hate gory parts in movies. I was scarred seeing the heart-ripping scene from Indiana Jones & the Temple of Doom amongst other things, if you told me back then I'd be able to sit through Watchmen I wouldn't have believed you. I'm still not interested in watching any of the Saw or Hostel movies though, I still have a line. But my point is, when I got over seeing MA15+ standard violence I came to appreciate those kinds of films more. I actually enjoyed Zombieland more than I enjoyed Avatar to be honest. MA15+ films sometimes have deeper themes and more gripping elements than your standard teen-aimed M-rated action film.
Cameron seemed to be too busy crafting a plot that wouldn't go over anyone's head, either by his choice or his executives. As a result, the film fails to drive home what is ultimately a more serious and devastating issue.
One point I'll add finally, for those who haven't seen it, I'd encourage you to watch A Christmas Carol in 3D at some point (I think it's left cinemas now), the 3D animation is actually quite natural... it's animation so it's obviously different to Avatar, but the spacial depth is extremely convincing, and the film doesn't try and make awkward 3D effects jut out at different moments.
on 14-01-2010 01:19 PM
It seems like at least one media outlet wants to put words in the Vatican's mouth. Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore merely commented that the reviewer found the movie 'bland' and added "[The film] gets bogged down by a spiritualism linked to the worship of nature,"... also a seperate radio station from the Vatican added that Avatar "cleverly winks at all those pseudo-doctrines that turn ecology into the religion of the millennium."
Neither of those comments are any kind of a big deal. It's just those reviewers found problems with Avatar that become painfully obvious to most people who've watched the film and have certain standards on screenplay (except all those reviewers who are lobbying to change the 5 star rating up to 6 stars). Yet that hasn't stopped NineMSN from getting into a flurry, claiming that the Vatican was simply hating on the film because of religious differences.
on 14-01-2010 03:57 PM
![]()
on 20-01-2010 09:49 AM
on 20-01-2010 10:33 AM
and so true....

Website ©2011 Sony Computer Entertainment Europe
All content, game titles, trade names and/or trade dress, trademarks, artwork and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. [more info]