Call of Duty

Reply

Level 8

Level 8
Ew_Tux
Posts: 6,338
Registered: ‎28-11-2007
Message 1 of 3 (202 Views)

Black Ops 2′s futuristic setting may put Activision in legal trouble

It appears Activision may have violated a Memorandum of Understanding from Infinity Ward which could land the company in legal trouble.

The gist of the story (which can be read in full at Game Informer) is that Infinity Ward’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) states that any Call of Duty games set after Vietnam will be exclusive to Infinity Ward. This includes any modern day, near future or distant future settings. As you now know, Black Ops 2 will take place in the year 2025.


Considering that the trial is yet to happen, it’s unclear if Activision could land itself in legal trouble thanks to Black Ops II’s futuristic setting. Game Informer spoke with Eric Chad, an intellectual property attorney with the firm Merchant & Gould. Regarding Activision’s punishment if Zampella and West win the lawsuit, Chad said “[Pulling Black Ops II from the shelves] is likely a possible remedy.” Read the full report at  Game Informer.

 

http://www.lensoftruth.com/black-ops-2s-futuristic-setting-may-put-activision-in-legal-trouble/

Please use plain text.
MVP
DNAtlantic
Posts: 4,833
Registered: ‎22-11-2008
Message 2 of 3 (111 Views)

Re: Black Ops 2′s futuristic setting may put Activision in legal trouble

Infinity Ward after CoD4 have made their games poo. In my own opinion Treyarch made each game 1 better than IW. Sure it's got it's own feel to it compared to IW's Modern Warfare, ie: Treyarch gameplay is slightly slower where as IW is speed speed speed.

I actually think IW are scared Treyarch will make a better modern day/ near future game than they ever will. Hence the b!tching from them :smileytongue:
Please use plain text.

Level 6

Level 6
DiscoDa
Posts: 4,891
Registered: ‎16-10-2007
Message 3 of 3 (106 Views)

Re: Black Ops 2′s futuristic setting may put Activision in legal trouble


DNAtlantic wrote:
Infinity Ward after CoD4 have made their games poo. In my own opinion Treyarch made each game 1 better than IW. Sure it's got it's own feel to it compared to IW's Modern Warfare, ie: Treyarch gameplay is slightly slower where as IW is speed speed speed.

I actually think IW are scared Treyarch will make a better modern day/ near future game than they ever will. Hence the b!tching from them :smileytongue:

World at War was a horrible mess, and most people seem to like Black Ops more than MW2/MW3 because it takes you longer to die, a good thing for players that can't keep up with the pace of the IW games.

 

In my opinion.

 photo AWESOMEO00.jpg
Please use plain text.
This widget could not be displayed.
Announcements

Welcome to the Call of Duty Forums!

For the latest news and updates on what is happening in the PlayStation community, head over to our Announcements & Events forum. To post a message, you will need to Sign In to the Forums using your PLAYSTATION®Network Sign In ID and password. If you do not yet have a PSN account, just click here to register.

 

For more information on Black Ops II click here!

Recent News