Call of Duty

[WORBBLY]

---

nuclear_predator wrote:

Great news

You got a link to the interview/article or whatever?

---

I don't have the source. It was posted over at CG... I'm just passing it on.

[RockHardSemi]

---

WORBBLY wrote:

---

RockHardSemi wrote:

I don't understand my internet. When I did that speed test it said I had:

Download speed of 450kb/sec

Upload speed of 200kb/sec (something similar to that anyway, not 100% sure)

However when I play Call of Duty I generally get a good signal.

---

Weird... But I take it you can't host?

---

Not all too sure. But when R_07, Magpie_7 and Xstatic had their Bolt Action match, I was the referee and also the host. I had 4 bars, they had 3 bars.

I heard someone say you can't be host unless your in DMZ or whatever that is, but to my knowledge I've never clicked a box called DMZ.

Ok now I'm playing World at War it says I have 3-4 bar signal, yet to me everyone is lagging, moving bit by bit. However on Modern Warfare it says I have 3-4 bar signal, no lagg at all.

Confused.com/idk

Message Edited by RockHardSemi on 31-03-2009 07:12 PM

[Geachie]

---

RockHardSemi wrote:

---

WORBBLY wrote:

---

RockHardSemi wrote:

I don't understand my internet. When I did that speed test it said I had:

Download speed of 450kb/sec

Upload speed of 200kb/sec (something similar to that anyway, not 100% sure)

However when I play Call of Duty I generally get a good signal.

---

Weird... But I take it you can't host?

---

Not all too sure. But when R_07, Magpie_7 and Xstatic had their Bolt Action match, I was the referee and also the host. I had 4 bars, they had 3 bars.

I heard someone say you can't be host unless your in DMZ or whatever that is, but to my knowledge I've never clicked a box called DMZ.

Ok now I'm playing World at War it says I have 3-4 bar signal, yet to me everyone is lagging, moving bit by bit. However on Modern Warfare it says I have 3-4 bar signal, no lagg at all.

Confused.com/idk

Message Edited by RockHardSemi on 31-03-2009 07:12 PM

---

Your answer is simple Infinity Ward>Treyarch.

[NIALL1989]

 

---

xshaihuludx wrote:
That's a bit of a shock, better visuals than the PC version?

---

COD4 was very very very resource sapping on pc, the ps3 version ran much more well

[Magpie_7]

---

NIALL1989 wrote:

 

---

xshaihuludx wrote:
That's a bit of a shock, better visuals than the PC version?

---

COD4 was very very very resource sapping on pc, the ps3 version ran much more well

---

Does that post not make sense or is it just me?

Message Edited by Magpie_7 on 31-03-2009 08:00 PM

[The_Last_Guy]

---

NIALL1989 wrote:

 

---

xshaihuludx wrote:
That's a bit of a shock, better visuals than the PC version?

---

COD4 was very very very resource sapping on pc, the ps3 version ran much more well

---

Don't you mean 'much more betterer'?

[Pyrowolf]

---

NIALL1989 wrote:

COD4 was very very very resource sapping on pc, the ps3 version ran much more....well....smoother in my opinion.

---

Give him a break, his keyboard batteries ran out, he texted me and asked if i could finish it off for him

[The_Last_Guy]

---

Pyrowolf wrote:

---

NIALL1989 wrote:

COD4 was very very very resource sapping on pc, the ps3 version ran much more....well....smoother in my opinion.

---

Give him a break, his keyboard batteries ran out, he texted me and asked if i could finish it off for him

---

Finish WHAT off for him?

Don't answer that!

[Pyrowolf]

Choose you words carefully Mr Last, 

They may be your last.

[The_Last_Guy]

---

Pyrowolf wrote:

Choose you words carefully Mr Last

---

Choose YOUR words carefully