Casillas got it back for Madrid and then he skys it, at least get it on target! anyway I have to admit bayern played the best and deserved it. Another 2 for Ronaldo though.
Level 3
martyn__gibbs wrote:
Tilly-uk wrote:Enough said...
Bet you weren't saying that in 2006, 2007 or 2009 though lol
Tilly-uk wrote:i could go with the first adjective. but to call chelsea cowardly and miserable is just laughable. it could be argued that barca are also cowardly and miserable. they only know one form of attack - through the middle. they are so stiff in their tactics they don't know how to change them. or it could be they're afraid to change - cowards. that they don't change makes them a one trick pony - albeit a very entertaining one-trick pony.
Don't blame Chelsea for playing the way they did at all, just think the description of their performance by the Spanish papers is the truth - it was cowardly, but it worked.
Cowardice is the perceived failure to demonstrate sufficient mental robustness and courage in the face of a challenge.
10 men at the nou camp, down 2-0. With the best part of 50mins to play.
Yet at FT the score is 2-2.
Chelsea were the complete opposite to cowardly. You and the spanish papers can jog on.
On tonight, happy with the result. Think we have a better chance vs Bayern.
Roll on the 19th. BRING. IT. ON!
Level 4
Tilly-uk wrote:
martyn__gibbs wrote:
Tilly-uk wrote:Enough said...
Bet you weren't saying that in 2006, 2007 or 2009 though lol
Tilly-uk wrote:i could go with the first adjective. but to call chelsea cowardly and miserable is just laughable. it could be argued that barca are also cowardly and miserable. they only know one form of attack - through the middle. they are so stiff in their tactics they don't know how to change them. or it could be they're afraid to change - cowards. that they don't change makes them a one trick pony - albeit a very entertaining one-trick pony.
Don't blame Chelsea for playing the way they did at all, just think the description of their performance by the Spanish papers is the truth - it was cowardly, but it worked.
Cowardice is the perceived failure to demonstrate sufficient mental robustness and courage in the face of a challenge.
10 men at the nou camp, down 2-0. With the best part of 50mins to play.
Yet at FT the score is 2-2.
Chelsea were the complete opposite to cowardly. You and the spanish papers can jog on.
On tonight, happy with the result. Think we have a better chance vs Bayern.
Roll on the 19th. BRING. IT. ON!
They showed a lack of courage by failing to go toe to toe with Barca over either of the games. Chelsea are allowed to play the way they did, and it worked perfectly, but the Spanish papers described it as everyone (apart from deluded Chelsea fans) saw it.
Either way it's done now, looking forward to the final. At least we won't have the bell.end that is John Terry lifting the trophy if they win it 
Level 3
martyn__gibbs wrote:
Tilly-uk wrote:
martyn__gibbs wrote:
Tilly-uk wrote:Enough said...
Bet you weren't saying that in 2006, 2007 or 2009 though lol
Tilly-uk wrote:i could go with the first adjective. but to call chelsea cowardly and miserable is just laughable. it could be argued that barca are also cowardly and miserable. they only know one form of attack - through the middle. they are so stiff in their tactics they don't know how to change them. or it could be they're afraid to change - cowards. that they don't change makes them a one trick pony - albeit a very entertaining one-trick pony.
Don't blame Chelsea for playing the way they did at all, just think the description of their performance by the Spanish papers is the truth - it was cowardly, but it worked.
Cowardice is the perceived failure to demonstrate sufficient mental robustness and courage in the face of a challenge.
10 men at the nou camp, down 2-0. With the best part of 50mins to play.
Yet at FT the score is 2-2.
Chelsea were the complete opposite to cowardly. You and the spanish papers can jog on.
On tonight, happy with the result. Think we have a better chance vs Bayern.
Roll on the 19th. BRING. IT. ON!
They showed a lack of courage by failing to go toe to toe with Barca over either of the games. Chelsea are allowed to play the way they did, and it worked perfectly, but the Spanish papers described it as everyone (apart from deluded Chelsea fans) saw it.
Either way it's done now, looking forward to the final. At least we won't have the bell.end that is John Terry lifting the trophy if they win it
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17860112
Dont you just LOVE IT!
Level 4
Tilly-uk wrote:
martyn__gibbs wrote:
Tilly-uk wrote:
martyn__gibbs wrote:
Tilly-uk wrote:Enough said...
Bet you weren't saying that in 2006, 2007 or 2009 though lol
Tilly-uk wrote:i could go with the first adjective. but to call chelsea cowardly and miserable is just laughable. it could be argued that barca are also cowardly and miserable. they only know one form of attack - through the middle. they are so stiff in their tactics they don't know how to change them. or it could be they're afraid to change - cowards. that they don't change makes them a one trick pony - albeit a very entertaining one-trick pony.
Don't blame Chelsea for playing the way they did at all, just think the description of their performance by the Spanish papers is the truth - it was cowardly, but it worked.
Cowardice is the perceived failure to demonstrate sufficient mental robustness and courage in the face of a challenge.
10 men at the nou camp, down 2-0. With the best part of 50mins to play.
Yet at FT the score is 2-2.
Chelsea were the complete opposite to cowardly. You and the spanish papers can jog on.
On tonight, happy with the result. Think we have a better chance vs Bayern.
Roll on the 19th. BRING. IT. ON!
They showed a lack of courage by failing to go toe to toe with Barca over either of the games. Chelsea are allowed to play the way they did, and it worked perfectly, but the Spanish papers described it as everyone (apart from deluded Chelsea fans) saw it.
Either way it's done now, looking forward to the final. At least we won't have the bell.end that is John Terry lifting the trophy if they win it
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17860112
Dont you just LOVE IT!
We still won't see him lifting the cup because you won't win. Tinpot club with no history. 
For the latest news and updates on what is happening in the PlayStation community, head over to our Announcements & Events forum. To post a message, you will need to Sign In to the Forums using your PLAYSTATION®Network Sign In ID and password. If you do not yet have a PSN account, just click here to register.
![](http://playstationeu.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/455996i9C4F2AFB8F26E4F7/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1")
![](http://playstationeu.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/455994iAD59869D8B9734A2/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1")
![](http://playstationeu.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/442776iF2C7F81D13EA4847/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1")
chrisa3211
englishgolfer
Gawge
Gresty
Husaria
Jacko_The_Lad
Kiez
magnum80
martyn__gibbs
Moghal2007
shanethegooner
skells22
SolidNinjaSnake
TalllPaul
xLegioNx
Website ©2013 Sony Computer Entertainment Europe
All content, game titles, trade names and/or trade dress, trademarks, artwork and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. [more info]
