General Discussion

[emw80]

---

dannyjt wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

dannyjt wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

Gawge wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

Gawge wrote:

COMPLETELY!

I mean... since we were born in this country, we should obviously get a free pass to all the benefits. There is something about happening to be born on a certain piece of rock that really entitles me to the great benefits of living in Britain. However, people who were born on another, less fortunate rock... they do not deserve these benefits. They should remain in their own country to starve, not better themselves and be exploited/killed. After all, I worked hard to be born on this rock!

---

Without the liberal sarcasm, why are we not looking at it how we should be, In the military they look out for each other, not everyone else.

---

How do you propose we define who "each other" and "everyone else" is?

People of the same colour, of the same religion, born on the same bit of rock?

---

You want to take christianity to a muslim country like in Egypt for example and see just how the tolerance we grant to others is given back in kind, then you'll end up like the coptic christians in Egypt

That's ONE exapmle of this crap.

---

And how many Muslims in Britain recieve abuse every day because of their faith?

---

Yes, how many muslim women have had acid thrown in their faces or killed with a hatchet etc for "shaming the family and their religion".

or how many "honor killings" have their been among muslims because they've deviated from their religious teachings, like marrying or even dating outside their religion, or for even as little as taking off their burka and walking outside with no face coverage.

---

I fail too see what you are getting at. I hope you're not suggesting that Muslims in some way deserve to be abused because of the crimes

---

C'mon dude Its not what im saying, and i think you know fine well that it wasnt,, i seen what you were getting at with your mention of this the first time, so i thought I'd turn that around just enough to show how much harm they already do to themselves, in fact it's more than harm, they kill each other, then blame their religion for their subhuman and disgusting actions, would you like me to show support for their actions or feel some kind of sympathy for them for what they do - just so i look like im accepting and multicultural enough in the eyes of the politically correct extremists, No, not happening.

I'm just waiting on them coming out and telling us all that its the british to blame for why they kill their women and throw acid in their face when they "dishoner their name or religion", by dating/marrying outside their faith/culture.

You guys want reperation payments every month for life too?

[dannyjt]

---

emw80 wrote:

---

dannyjt wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

dannyjt wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

Gawge wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

Gawge wrote:

COMPLETELY!

I mean... since we were born in this country, we should obviously get a free pass to all the benefits. There is something about happening to be born on a certain piece of rock that really entitles me to the great benefits of living in Britain. However, people who were born on another, less fortunate rock... they do not deserve these benefits. They should remain in their own country to starve, not better themselves and be exploited/killed. After all, I worked hard to be born on this rock!

---

Without the liberal sarcasm, why are we not looking at it how we should be, In the military they look out for each other, not everyone else.

---

How do you propose we define who "each other" and "everyone else" is?

People of the same colour, of the same religion, born on the same bit of rock?

---

You want to take christianity to a muslim country like in Egypt for example and see just how the tolerance we grant to others is given back in kind, then you'll end up like the coptic christians in Egypt

That's ONE exapmle of this crap.

---

And how many Muslims in Britain recieve abuse every day because of their faith?

---

Yes, how many muslim women have had acid thrown in their faces or killed with a hatchet etc for "shaming the family and their religion".

or how many "honor killings" have their been among muslims because they've deviated from their religious teachings, like marrying or even dating outside their religion, or for even as little as taking off their burka and walking outside with no face coverage.

---

I fail too see what you are getting at. I hope you're not suggesting that Muslims in some way deserve to be abused because of the crimes

---

C'mon dude Its not what im saying, and i think you know fine well that it wasnt,, i seen what you were getting at with your mention of this the first time, so i thought I'd turn that around just enough to show how much harm they already do to themselves, in fact it's more than harm, they kill each other, then blame their religion for their subhuman and disgusting actions, would you like me to show support for their actions or feel some kind of sympathy for them for what they do - just so i look like im accepting and multicultural enough in the eyes of the politically correct extremists, No, not happening.

I'm just waiting on them coming out and telling us all that its the british to blame for why they kill their women and throw acid in their face when they "dishoner their name or religion", by dating/marrying outside their faith/culture.

You guys want reperation payments every month for life too?

---

Well then, I fail to see how this connects to what I was originally pointing out to which was the fact that in some areas in Britain, Muslims have to put up with the same kind of abuse as that lady living in Egypt, simply because of their faith.

You then decided to deviate from that and begin to mention certain acts of violence that have occurd in the Muslim community, which is where I begin to lose the plot. I like how you removed a couple of words from the end of the sentence from my post which was, "of few." This highlights my main concern coming from your posts, I feel as if you're trying to associate a community with a minority of psychopaths and extremists.

I hope it's just the case of you using a poor choice of words and grammar and not because you're a bigot.

[PatC_PSN]

---

emw80 wrote:

Each other, I would define as,  born in the same country, and/or are of the same culture and heritage, that's leaving out religion for you,,, you want me to add that little bit extra, the bit you'd call racist?, then i will, each other is also, those of the same ethnicity,,, How the individual chooses to prioritize that, is of course up to them.

---

Just to be clear then, you're saying that white people should "look out for each other" but not be concerned about people with alternative skin colours because they shouldn't really be here in the first place (you know, in our nation, walking along our streets as you previously noted)?

[PatC_PSN]

---

emw80 wrote:

C'mon dude Its not what im saying

---

I think that what you're saying is now crystal clear.

[emw80]

---

dannyjt wrote:

Well then, I fail to see how this connects to what I was originally pointing out to which was the fact that in some areas in Britain, Muslims have to put up with the same kind of abuse as that lady living in Egypt, simply because of their faith.

You then decided to deviate from that and begin to mention certain acts of violence that have occurd in the Muslim community, which is where I begin to lose the plot. I like how you removed a couple of words from the end of the sentence from my post which was, "of few." This highlights my main concern coming from your posts, I feel as if you're trying to associate a community with a minority of psychopaths and extremists.

I hope it's just the case of you using a poor choice of words and grammar and not because you're a bigot.

---

You want to know why i removed this part "of few", because you play down the reality of it by using the word FEW, when in fact its been going on for decades here in the UK, if you had said "Few Hundred", or "Few Thousand", I wouldnt have thought anything.

If you feel you want to call me a bigot, or whatever name you can think of, then please do so, I'm sure you have read the things i have written so far (if you have been reading through this thread), and I'm sure like many others who may have been reading so far, you'll be thinking of me as such.

I honestly dont mind, but not because I have a heart of stone so to speak, but because me an Warren Jeeves are going to immigrate to Ireland to collect our entertainment allowances, grant for a car, and free house, and free medical card, and we're going to pick out houses next to Fen and become drinking buddies4life innit -  and party like crazy with our Japanese girls (who btw are over 16).

[mr_maroon]

Just to clear some things up about Diabetes:

@Fenian:

If you're thirsty ALL the time (drinking litres of water to make up for it as well), your eyes are dry, you're ***** like a racehorse and you're losing weight, there's a good chance you've got a type of diabetes. Go see a GP ASAP, otherwise you could end up in hospital for a serious length of time.

@DannyJTL

There's no reason for you to start watching what you eat (beyond, y'know, being healthy). Type 2 diabetes is what you're thinking of - it's when, largely due to a crap diet, your body builds up an insulin resistance, and can't produce enough insulin to cope with the amount of glucose you're taking in. This is the kind fat people get and isn't heredetory.

Type 1 diabetes is (arguably) heredetory. It's when your body triggers an autoimmune reponse, and basically kills its own pancreas, stopping insulin production. When this happens, it happens, there's no stopping it. It sucks.

You're unlikely to get it, but make sure you're on the lookout for the telltale signs, as above.

[emw80]

---

PatC_PSN wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

Each other, I would define as,  born in the same country, and/or are of the same culture and heritage, that's leaving out religion for you,,, you want me to add that little bit extra, the bit you'd call racist?, then i will, each other is also, those of the same ethnicity,,, How the individual chooses to prioritize that, is of course up to them.

---

Just to be clear then, you're saying that white people should "look out for each other" but not be concerned about people with alternative skin colours because they shouldn't really be here in the first place (you know, in our nation, walking along our streets as you previously noted)?

---

You can dismantle what i have said into digestable chunks to fit the reality in which you currently reside, or the one you are trying to create.

It ok Pat, I understand its something you just have to do, its in your nature and your very being demands nothing less.

[PatC_PSN]

---

emw80 wrote:

---

PatC_PSN wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

Each other, I would define as,  born in the same country, and/or are of the same culture and heritage, that's leaving out religion for you,,, you want me to add that little bit extra, the bit you'd call racist?, then i will, each other is also, those of the same ethnicity,,, How the individual chooses to prioritize that, is of course up to them.

---

Just to be clear then, you're saying that white people should "look out for each other" but not be concerned about people with alternative skin colours because they shouldn't really be here in the first place (you know, in our nation, walking along our streets as you previously noted)?

---

You can dismantle what i have said into digestable chunks to fit the reality in which you currently reside, or the one you are trying to create.

---

Cut the pseudo-intellectual BS, it impresses nobody. You're a good old-fashioned racist.

[emw80]

---

PatC_PSN wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

---

PatC_PSN wrote:

---

emw80 wrote:

Each other, I would define as,  born in the same country, and/or are of the same culture and heritage, that's leaving out religion for you,,, you want me to add that little bit extra, the bit you'd call racist?, then i will, each other is also, those of the same ethnicity,,, How the individual chooses to prioritize that, is of course up to them.

---

Just to be clear then, you're saying that white people should "look out for each other" but not be concerned about people with alternative skin colours because they shouldn't really be here in the first place (you know, in our nation, walking along our streets as you previously noted)?

---

You can dismantle what i have said into digestable chunks to fit the reality in which you currently reside, or the one you are trying to create.

---

Cut the pseudo-intellectual BS, it impresses nobody. You're a good old-fashioned racist.

---

Ahhh There we go, and at last  finally, when you cant be bothered anymore to thrash out a debate/discussion, just label the guy your debating as racist and move on.

[PatC_PSN]

---

emw80 wrote:

Ahhh There we go, and at last  finally, when you cant be bothered anymore to thrash out a debate/discussion, just label the guy your debating as racist and move on.

---

Bigot would probably have been a better term to use. I've never found much point to debating with people like you though. All you really want to do is spread your ignorance-fuelled hatred through selective, sensationalist examples of why some people have no right to be in this/your country.

You've done it many times here, and your poisonous agenda has always been pretty transparent. I'm surprised that you haven't been banned from here. You dismissed my question about skin colour as a "racism test", and then went to acknowledge that ethnicity is, in part, how you distinguish 'us' who should "look out for each other" and the implied 'them'. And of course you go on to offer the standard disclaimer that you have nothing against 'them', you just don't want 'them' over here - in our nation, walking along our streets. "I'm not racist but ....."

Do you find the white pointy hat a bit awkward when getting on and off buses?