Level 4
ProjectVRD wrote:
But F12010 is jaggy fest. Even the tracks are jaggy. Sure it looks great PC... but PS3? You having a laugh right?
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I only have that on PC,
Annoyingly, on a mulit platform title, i tend to expect that from the graphics now aswell 
But the main bulk of the work I was talking about, was creating the physics to do with downforce, tyre wear etc. PD have just used what they already had before.
And this is an exclusive, so they haven't had to have tems working on different formats either.
I'm just not overly impressed with how they've used all that time is all.
Level 2
ProjectVRD wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:
ProjectVRD wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:
ProjectVRD wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:
DrTrouserPlank wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:Screen rip?!? *****?? 5 years in development and they cant even get rid of screen rip. Fairly enjoyable game, but when its taken this long and cost so much money to produce how can this still be a problem? especially since most cars and tracks were in GT4.
OK rant over, i feel better now, off back on COD
Seems like that would be the best place for you.
Yes it does, i like a game thats actually playable online...........
CODBO is not playable online... didn't you get the memo?! It has only been mentioned in the gaming industry news about a million times!
And didn't anyone tell you most of the guns in CODBO was in CODMW and CODMW2? Do we have acceptable double standards in your world?
And what about the awful gameplay and graphics that suck bad? It is not even HD... it well below 720p.
You come here complaining about GT5 and then big up COD?!
You sir are a joke of epic proportions!
we are not talking about COD moron read the rest of the posts. Timmy
Yes you are!
It is there highlighted in your post!!! BOLD!
Goodby fanboy.
Once again READ THE REST OF THE POSTS
No!
I am replying to your above quoted post!
You have been owned... now deal with it and go away!
LOL ive been 'owned' because you seem unable to grasp what the point of the thread was? or are unable to read more than 1 post highlighted by someone else because it hurts your head?
crazy fool
Level 5
Daveyboy69 wrote:
ProjectVRD wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:
ProjectVRD wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:
ProjectVRD wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:
DrTrouserPlank wrote:
Daveyboy69 wrote:Screen rip?!? *****?? 5 years in development and they cant even get rid of screen rip. Fairly enjoyable game, but when its taken this long and cost so much money to produce how can this still be a problem? especially since most cars and tracks were in GT4.
OK rant over, i feel better now, off back on COD
Seems like that would be the best place for you.
Yes it does, i like a game thats actually playable online...........
CODBO is not playable online... didn't you get the memo?! It has only been mentioned in the gaming industry news about a million times!
And didn't anyone tell you most of the guns in CODBO was in CODMW and CODMW2? Do we have acceptable double standards in your world?
And what about the awful gameplay and graphics that suck bad? It is not even HD... it well below 720p.
You come here complaining about GT5 and then big up COD?!
You sir are a joke of epic proportions!
we are not talking about COD moron read the rest of the posts. Timmy
Yes you are!
It is there highlighted in your post!!! BOLD!
Goodby fanboy.
Once again READ THE REST OF THE POSTS
No!
I am replying to your above quoted post!
You have been owned... now deal with it and go away!
LOL ive been 'owned' because you seem unable to grasp what the point of the thread was? or are unable to read more than 1 post highlighted by someone else because it hurts your head?
crazy fool
I know what the point of the thread was... it is quoted above.
You have a problem man, you deliberately trolled and still do so. Just go away or I will report you.
Level 3
Just thought l would add some corrections to some of the posts, l love GT5 l must admit but can still admit some parts could of been better and agree that some things might have been removed to get it released this year which is a same. Now slagging it off saying they had 5 years to develop and then compare it to CODBO is crazy, these guys actually went backwards and BO is using the engine from WAW and just updated that. So please dont try saying this is better as MW2 was far better gameplay but Treyarch was so up there own arses they wanted to prove that there engine was better so went back and used WAW engine. trust me when l say this Black Ops is *HIT. The only reason most of you play it is because it has the COD tag attached to it, if this was a new game release with new name no one would even be online playing never mind moaning about. Anyway as l was saying yes GT5 could of been better in certain areas but if you dont like it do what l did with CODBO and trade it in but please dont compare a game that has gone backwards to GT5
Level 2
W3STY_80 wrote:Just thought l would add some corrections to some of the posts, l love GT5 l must admit but can still admit some parts could of been better and agree that some things might have been removed to get it released this year which is a same. Now slagging it off saying they had 5 years to develop and then compare it to CODBO is crazy, these guys actually went backwards and BO is using the engine from WAW and just updated that. So please dont try saying this is better as MW2 was far better gameplay but Treyarch was so up there own arses they wanted to prove that there engine was better so went back and used WAW engine. trust me when l say this Black Ops is *HIT. The only reason most of you play it is because it has the COD tag attached to it, if this was a new game release with new name no one would even be online playing never mind moaning about. Anyway as l was saying yes GT5 could of been better in certain areas but if you dont like it do what l did with CODBO and trade it in but please dont compare a game that has gone backwards to GT5
I wasnt comparing BO directly( see post at bottom) , just said it doesnt screen tear as much! I like the game, The issue i had was with Polyphony Digital and why it had been in development 5+ years and had screen tear and does it do the PS3 justice? i dont think it does.
*The point being MW2 or black ops wasnt in development for 5 years and doesnt suffer from anywhere near as much screen tearing, what have PD been doing for 5 goddamn years? dont get me wrong the game is good but graphical problems from an inhouse studio with that much time to develop it shouldnt happen, look at Forza, graphically it has no screen tear and it plays well. GT is supposed to be a Sony showpiece, showing what the more alleged powerfull ps3 can do over the 360. Does it do the console justice?*
Hello Anonymous! Welcome to the Gran Turismo Boards!
For the latest news and updates on what is happening in the PlayStation community, head over to our Announcements & Events forum.
To post a message, you will need to Sign In to the Forums using your PLAYSTATION®Network Sign In ID and password. If you do not yet have a PSN account, just click here to register.
For more information on Gran Turismo click here!
Website ©2013 Sony Computer Entertainment Europe
All content, game titles, trade names and/or trade dress, trademarks, artwork and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. [more info]
