Killzone

[Pilksflyer]

---

Parv-B wrote:

Lol, hackers as always...

Saying that though, COD 4 was probably the best game of the bunch. MW2 wasnt terrible, but COD 4 is the most legendary shooter imo. Unless KZ3 exceeds expectations of course, then I'll change my mind. I just love those maps!

---

Very true about cod4.  kz3 is awesome but im let down by spongy players more often than not.

[InfiniteStates]

Every other FPS is just filler for me between Battlefield games anyway to be honest. Roll on Battlefield 3...

(In a big f*ck off tank).

((With C4 attached to it)).

(((And gunship support))).

[KingStevie]

---

Bluez_n_2z wrote:

I play Call of Duty: Black Ops and I do like it, it's a fun game when you get into a game with good people (your team and the enemy team) but that just hardy ever happens  

Killzone 3 is nothing like Call of Duty: Black Ops, I think the Hardcore Call of Duty community expect every game to be related to Call of Duty somehow and when they see the slow movement on Killzone they complain that they can't do a 360 no scope or whatever they call it.

Killzone is a more fun game because there is less people trying to spin around trying to get a hit marker.

I'm guessing a lot of people traded Black Ops in because a lot of people seem to complain about it.

---

I liked black ops for me it was maybe the best most balanced cod online but aye got boring traded it in

Thing with CoD is its an easy game to do well in and do well on your own without any thought or teamwork thats why so many like it I think

[BarryBlockEd]

ive played cod since the first one came out in 2003 on pc and bought kz3 about five days ago and all i can say now is COD SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Kz3 RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[SilentShadow777]

killzone 3 storyline is a tad short and while the gameplay of each level was fun when considered as a piece of gamplay without the context of the storyline, the storyline its self i wasnt too pleased with.

the only of the game has been designed to make the game more accessible unfortunately i think this has meant attracting the kind of corner camping / base camping people that ruin the enjoyment of a game. this couple with the removing of any features which made it unique, like the custom private matches, make for a very broken game which at best has potential given the right attention to be brought close to the status of the it predecessor. while i realise this was to stop boosting , it really hasnt stopped it and those who want to boost will always find a way.

while all of this does annoy e about killzone 3, i still wouldnt consider selling it quite yet.

a number of fixes are currently in the pipeline and i have a number of other games to play including bad company, which i had hoped killzone 3 would be more similar to than what it has become, until killzone 3 if fixed.

[Celtic-Assasinz]

---

InfiniteStates wrote:

Every other FPS is just filler for me between Battlefield games anyway to be honest. Roll on Battlefield 3...

(In a big f*ck off tank).

((With C4 attached to it)).

(((And gunship support))).

---

I couldn;t agree more!

[nads911]

I was going to trade it in for homefront, since i only bought it for the campaign, before i read the stuff on these forums about the connection problems of homefront and the game itself. 

But recently really got into the online of KZ3 which is getting better since people seems to know what they are doing now, and there seems less camping or people are find ways to counter the camping spots. So unless Crysis has epic reviews and you tube vids i'll stick with this for a while. 

These forums are a great resource for true game reviews

[Parv-B]

@nads

Yeah, its pretty good to come to a community like this and get instant user reviews in my opinion.

As well as that though, I use metacritic ( www.metacritic.com), because it accumulates all the critic reviews (critics will range from big names such as Gamespot and 1up) and user reviews. You should check it out. Pretty accurate.

As for Crysis 2 reviews, its doing pretty well from what I've seen. Its got a metacritic score of 87 out of 100%, which is very good considering the Crysis series was based around the computer. Killzone 3 has currently got 84%. Only a small margine, but obviously the Crysis series has done some what better to get the extra 3 points. We might need to wait a bit though, because Killzone 3 has had something like 81 critic reviews, and Crysis has only had about 16. Looks like a promising game though

Edit: Also check this site out-  Crysis 2 review scores

Most sites have given the Crysis near perfect high scores, such as 9/10s and 4/5's