Level 4
Level 5
There was'nt enough advertisment for it in shops or the telly unlike other games to say it was exclusive to Sony they failed in the marketing.....
It was the game players wanted !!!!!!
Squads of eight each with there own chat net....
Commanders at each level could talk to other commanders to coordinate actions....
Only commanders to call in heavy assets.....
FRAGO's on targets so you knew where to go.....
The players failed MAG!!!!!!
A lot of players have no grasp of tactics as they have been brought up on "run & gun" & thats what the game needs tactics!!!!
Its why you have the FRAGO's & the chat system to coordinate & motivate your squad to achieve your objectives..
A lot of the time you see commanders that just use there heavy assets as there own & not as the platoons or even help another platoon who are struggling.....
They should of had the PL's & OC's seperate from the sections so they could do what they are meant to do control the battle & be where there needed!!!!
PL's should of been able to set FRAGO's to focus the troops where they wanted them to be.....
The Domination games are fantastic when you have a bunch of players who work together....
Level 2
For some reason it seems that some people care much more about KDR than they do working as a team and winning the game.
Tbh, I think it was ahead of its time. People are still looking for Call of Duty in any fps they play. I really hope Sony have plans for a MAG2 but with the closure of Zipper I dont suppose thats likely. A real shame.
With such a high player count in each game it really needed the support of the community, for whatever reason it never got that. I dont know why though, for me it certainly stands as one of the best shooters on ps3.
Level 5
ohmsford wrote:
Tbh, I think it was ahead of its time. People are still looking for Call of Duty in any fps they play.
It was a very bold experiment 
Its survived just over two years so far sadly theres not as many players at times so your waiting for games 
The rot set in from the start really with ppl complaining about this weapon was more powerful than this & of course the big one S.V.E.R.'s positions are better than ours!!!! TBH in some places they were & things were rightly changed .....And Zipper chased the error trying to satisfy everyone 
At the start S.V.E.R. were very dominant really due to the calibre of players they had!!!!
Level 3
saberdragon wrote:There was'nt enough advertisment for it in shops or the telly unlike other games to say it was exclusive to Sony they failed in the marketing.....
It was the game players wanted !!!!!!
Squads of eight each with there own chat net....
Commanders at each level could talk to other commanders to coordinate actions....
Only commanders to call in heavy assets.....
FRAGO's on targets so you knew where to go.....
The players failed MAG!!!!!!
A lot of players have no grasp of tactics as they have been brought up on "run & gun" & thats what the game needs tactics!!!!
Its why you have the FRAGO's & the chat system to coordinate & motivate your squad to achieve your objectives..
A lot of the time you see commanders that just use there heavy assets as there own & not as the platoons or even help another platoon who are struggling.....
They should of had the PL's & OC's seperate from the sections so they could do what they are meant to do control the battle & be where there needed!!!!
PL's should of been able to set FRAGO's to focus the troops where they wanted them to be.....
The Domination games are fantastic when you have a bunch of players who work together....
110% agree with you mate.
Level 5
jack-the-boxer wrote:Devs should not be listening to teenage kids on American forums.
Thats a problem with a lot of games!!!!!
The developers just seem to listen to the US forums & magazines & seem to ignore the EU & other regions
Even though I have a US forum account I dont use it that much as its to much of a bear pit at times...
