PlayStation®3 General Discussion

[R3D_D3V1LS_9]

Ok fancy a game of Brink at 10:30 ?

[Ew_Tux]

---

R3D_D3V1LS_9 wrote:

Ok fancy a game of Brink at 10:30 ?

---

Can't say exact time but sure , i'm up for it.  Not sure what level you are, i'm nearing level 20 (rank 5) so if you are lower it's best for you to host seeing the AI takes the level difficulty from the host

[existenz1]

KZ3  !!!

[Feck2009]

killzone 3 is so much better than brink.

[FightingFirst]

Ive got both. Killzone 3 campaign is so-so to under average. Just a lot of big explosions, no thought into it really. MP looks nice but maps are very much a meat grinder with people camping choke points. Not much teamwork either really so gets very boring very fast.

Brink on the other hand, is much brighter graphically but suffers a bit more from pop ins. Weapons are very balanced and basically sp is also MP as well. Its an interesting concept. However, they made a massive mistake putting the online on peer to peer and a shoddy matchmaking system means its hard to get into games which are full or you arent teleporting around although they say they are fixing the issue. However, when you do get into a good match it plays really well. Its a bit like team fortress 2 in the sense that it is all about team work.

All in all both are over-hyped games that in many places are lacking. If you havent got it already I would recommend BC2 above both of them easily. Or I would just wait until Battlefield 3.

Hope that helps.

FF

[Ew_Tux]

---

FightingFirst wrote:

All in all both are over-hyped games that in many places are lacking. If you havent got it already I would recommend BC2 above both of them easily. Or I would just wait until Battlefield 3.

---

Although i had BC2 and enjoyed it i disagree with the comment. After 'Nam was released DICE fully dropped support and the game became a laggy nightmare ... I've traded it in because of this and it's really left an aftertaste in my mouth which could lead me not getting BF3 due to the shabby support.

[FightingFirst]

---

Ew_Tux wrote:

---

FightingFirst wrote:

All in all both are over-hyped games that in many places are lacking. If you havent got it already I would recommend BC2 above both of them easily. Or I would just wait until Battlefield 3.

---

Although i had BC2 and enjoyed it i disagree with the comment. After 'Nam was released DICE fully dropped support and the game became a laggy nightmare ... I've traded it in because of this and it's really left an aftertaste in my mouth which could lead me not getting BF3 due to the shabby support.

---

Really? Ive never had a problem with it. I used to lag a bit after a patch but it was never unplayable or happened frequently. It was later fixed by another patch and I believe DICE added more servers so I never really had a problem. Only real problem I had was that it was a console port, glad I didnt buy it for pc would have been really disapointed then.