PlayStation®Home General Discussion

[Wait-Jester-Sec]

---

FRO_OTKAIK wrote:

Hmm so much response to a few lines which i admit sounded a little harsh but the message there was,i was suggesting to meinhardtrynn not to meet your said group like you are all suggesting he should, That's my right is it not,forums are for different point of views so to act like it is blasphemy is a little rich,but not really unexpected as its how you act when people don't agree with you,isn't that right?

@Jester Yes btw,i have such silly things said about my name also,i don't ask people to rush an defend me over something so nonessential like you have though. I find you certainly Jester quite an offensive proposal as someone running this,almost as offensive if i was to be honest. What happens a few months down the line Jester an you end up not liking someone in the group? Do you then hand out their intimate photos to all an sundry like you have done in the past??

---

You dont know me. You do not know anything about me. I have never and will never hand out photos like you have suggested above. Was that an attempt to get under my skin? If someone doesnt like me or vice versa then i will attempt to talk it out and solve it. I apologise for the tone of my previous post, it was a bad day all round but that still doesnt exceuse my actions. But i dont hand out photos of anyone ever...

[FRO_OTKAIK]

Theres a girl been telling that story of you for two years on home then Jester. If it's wrong i apologise.

[Wait-Jester-Sec]

This is the first i have heard about it But no i dont do that kind of thing. I have been told there is another user with jester in the ID people have asked me if i am him. I'm not him tho

[Furys-embrace]

Fro, while I agree with some of your sentiments regarding Sony staff and the friendships/favourites on here being a bit off and dare I say it unprofessional IN THE PAST (interesting you quote Nero and I I00% agree with you on that one, but look what happened to him) I think you are being a bit unfair now. Have you actually been to one of Vicki's & Jester's community meet ups yet? Before you start making accusations about people on here perhaps you should try meeting some of these community members first, I did last week, and they arent the villains you are making them out to be. You're attacking the wrong people on this occassion. 

[FRO_OTKAIK]

Granted,an as i said to Jester if what i was told was wrong i apologise. I'd always avoided that person due to what i was told,so if it's all a lie then the person that's been telling it need to take a long hard look at themselves at the real trouble it can cause. I said at the start of my explanation for yesterdays remark that i was a little harsh an then went on to explain the foundations for it,Vicky's response was to act petulant an that's not really a response i'd expect from someone acting as the community's voice of reason. That's her issue though,not mine.

Yet if all that abuse of power is in the past,where has all of today's replies for the 'i have an idea' thread suddenly vanished too after i replied to that nasty individual i was asking Ross about earlier?? If i suddenly start naming home users on here an asking what they are doing here as i know they are on the sex offenders register,even though that would be false,is it still ok to do so? I'd just like to know where exactly someone draws the line here,an don't quote home/forum rules at me as clearly,they don't abide to some.

[Furys-embrace]

I dont think the removal of those remarks was an abuse of power, more like good moderation in my opinion. That thread was on the verge of turning into a slanging match because the "nasty individual" you speak of decided to throw their ten cents in, and when they get involved threads invariably end up getting locked and or removed.  At least the thread is still there in part and the RELEVANT discussion is there for community members to see. Fro, come to the community meet tomorrow if you are available and try building some bridges rather than burning them. You strike me as a smart and reasonable guy so rather than listen to home gossip see for yourself first hand there is nothing untoward going on. 

[Legendary_Vicki]

Yeah why not? You should come along and see for yourself that we are a friendly and welcoming bunch. We ain't all bad lol. As i said before all is welcome so feel free to come along

[FRO_OTKAIK]

Ok ... First of all thank you both (Fury/Vicky) for inviting me to your meetup but i'm not around at all tomorrow,i'm sure you'll cope though. I didn't realise that's how moderation worked here btw in relation to the other thread as i only visit here now an again. I have to admit though Vicky,i did take a pop at you for the wrong reasons i.e tarring you with the same brush an based on affiliations an for that i was wrong an apologise. I think it's pretty clear what my main gripe is an it certainly is nothing to do with your community meetups. I am not perfect,perfectly flawed perhaps. i just feel that when someone oversteps the boundaries so grossly an nothing is done about it,i mean it wasn't a case of sticks an stones,it was a criminal offence what was said an then it's swept under the carpet,i can only assume that's down to friendship/affiliation with the right/wrong person. I'm pretty sure if I or the majority of homelings had done that we'd have felt the repercussions a long time ago. I'll get off my high horse now an stop repeating my whine like pooey but i'd still like some explanation from a moderator,if it's not too much trouble?

Thank you,goodnight an enjoy your meeting,in peace x

[Legendary_Vicki]

Appology accepted kind sir i know what it's like to feel annoyed about things but i's probs best to maybe take a different approach next time. You'll find you can still express your opinions without it getting nasty. We are all mainly a pretty civilised bunch although not always  

[Furys-embrace]

---

FRO_OTKAIK wrote:

Ok ... First of all thank you both (Fury/Vicky) for inviting me to your meetup but i'm not around at all tomorrow,i'm sure you'll cope though. I didn't realise that's how moderation worked here btw in relation to the other thread as i only visit here now an again. I have to admit though Vicky,i did take a pop at you for the wrong reasons i.e tarring you with the same brush an based on affiliations an for that i was wrong an apologise. I think it's pretty clear what my main gripe is an it certainly is nothing to do with your community meetups. I am not perfect,perfectly flawed perhaps. i just feel that when someone oversteps the boundaries so grossly an nothing is done about it,i mean it wasn't a case of sticks an stones,it was a criminal offence what was said an then it's swept under the carpet,i can only assume that's down to friendship/affiliation with the right/wrong person. I'm pretty sure if I or the majority of homelings had done that we'd have felt the repercussions a long time ago. I'll get off my high horse now an stop repeating my whine like pooey but i'd still like some explanation from a moderator,if it's not too much trouble?

Thank you,goodnight an enjoy your meeting,in peace x

---

I knew you were a reasonable chap Fro, and it takes a big man to admit when hes wrong and to apologise for it, especially on the internet, if Kudos actually ment something and was active on this section of the forums I'd be clicking it on your post now.

Its a shame you cant make the meet up this week, hopefully you can attend a future one and see for yourself they arent a bad bunch with their own pet mods they can "sic" on people while turning a blind eye and allowing others to get away with murder.

As for the questions you have directed at LordRoss, I dont think its appropriate to discuss things like that on this public forum and perhaps its better dealt with via PM? I'm not even sure if the moderation team are even allowed to discuss their decisions/actions anyway. So if you dont get a response it may not be a case of just sweeping things under the carpet, but just Sony policy. Also, hes not the ONLY moderator who monitors these boards so it may have been one of his collegues who handled the incident you are referring to.