PlayStation®Home General Discussion

[KrazyFace]

They should have T-bagging too then lol

[GoodBytes]

---

KrazyFace wrote:
They should have T-bagging too then lol

---

This is already available somewhat.

I also would like to see a basic level of avatar interaction on Home. I know the various reason why its not going to happen. But I would still like to be able to hug and shake someones hand now and again 

[Ankovmovtov]

---

KrazyFace schreef:
I dunno you two, if the person receiving the P2P request can turn it down, or even completely off then I don't see why this wouldn't work. I think it's a great idea, but I'd be more interested in seeing stuff like handshakes, footsey-swears and Glasgow kisses. Obviously you'd need something for the lovers, and in these cases these interactions could be confined to personal spaces maybe?

It's definitely something Sony should look at though, nice idea OP.

---

With this I would love to have it added. Also, I want to be able to dance WITH someone! Not just a lame dance where the male version is also often faster than the female's, so it's getting out of synchronise. I often see avatars actually dancing into each other with the Salsa, it looks rather stupid.

And yes, it should be turned off at times, otherwise I imagine the pervs would have a new way of harrassing females -.-

[OoO-avatar-OoO]

I think it’s a great idea that could work if you have different options that show up depending on whom you are interacting with and where.  The basic menu shows up when you encounter anyone on home in a public space.  An extended menu for those that are on your friends list and even more options that show up when in personal spaces.  Couple that with the ability to turn the feature on\off and you have a winner.

[xElfenLied_US]

Please God no. Stuff like high-5's would be fine, but I don't want the hugging/kissing etc.

I would just refuse to use Home after that, because perves would be all over the shot like a leech invasion!

Even if there was an option to turn off or on, what's the point? 70% of Home users would turn it off, while the rest have it on, attempting to prey on the females, and it would just be a waste of time and money spent on something not used except for perving.

[EdwCarnby]

Knowing me I would probably spam hugs and kisses to blokes trying to chat up women so that they get cheesed off, the woman laughs and changes spaces so I'm left with a really angry sexually frustrated dude giving me beef

[Furys-embrace]

---

EdwCarnby wrote:

Knowing me I would probably spam hugs and kisses to blokes trying to chat up women so that they get cheesed off, the woman laughs and changes spaces so I'm left with a really angry sexually frustrated dude giving me beef

---

when what he really wanted to do was give pork, virtually.

[xElfenLied_US]

---

EdwCarnby wrote:

Knowing me I would probably spam hugs and kisses to blokes trying to chat up "women" so that they get cheesed off, the woman laughs and changes spaces so I'm left with a really angry sexually frustrated dude giving me beef

---

Fixed. There are no females on the internet! 

[williamhughes]

This sounds cool but........if most people will have it off what the point because if somebody else wants do a action and you want them to do the action you both wont be able to do the actions *phew* -____-

[KrazyFace]

Yes but there are plenty of times when a group of friends are together and there are no pervs around. Besides, you could have a setting where the option only shows for people on your list, making stranger requests obsolete! It could work, easy. And Ducky's just afraid of contact of any kind so don't listen to her LOL