PlayStation®Network General

[Ddave_73]

---

Ash_sx125 wrote:

im just fed up of people picking apart the playstation, posting about how much they dislike the PSN and why its so inferior to XBL.

---

 

you come to a 360 vs PS3 thread and complain because people are discussing the aspects of the consoles that are better than the other ?

Now I am getting a little bit fed up of people doing that, you cant expect to come to a 360 vs ps3 thread and not have people talking about live being overall a better multiplayer system than psn.

Many people are not actually saying they dislike psn, its simply being pointed out that Live is the better of the two and it is for many reasons already pointed out.

you should be fed up with sony for not delivering the best possible multiplayer system, not the people who have been asked what is the best (360 vs PS3 thread) and are simply speaking the truth.

[iWiLLsaVeU]

---

DarkAssassin089 wrote:

ps3 is the better console(technolgy). but 360 has better online i would rather a console with better online than a console which has a blu ray which i never use..

Do you not know that ps3 games are on blu ray disks?

otherwise you just contradicted yourself

---

ye i did no...but the games aint called. call of duty *blueray*

and when you talk about a blu-ray drive you talk abotu blu-ray dvds like iron man.so stop trying to be smart.

[solidus469]

---

iWiLLsaVeU wrote:

---

DarkAssassin089 wrote:

ps3 is the better console(technolgy). but 360 has better online i would rather a console with better online than a console which has a blu ray which i never use..

Do you not know that ps3 games are on blu ray disks?

otherwise you just contradicted yourself

---

ye i did no...but the games aint called. call of duty *blueray*

and when you talk about a blu-ray drive you talk abotu blu-ray dvds like iron man.so stop trying to be smart.

---

The game discs are identical to the Blu-ray movie discs, and there's no such thing as a "Blu-ray DVD". They're different formats.... 

[Ddave_73]

yes but I think the point he was trying to make is that games dont seam to require bluray capacity with very very few exceptions (metal gear being the only game I know of that needed more than a dvd9)..

[solidus469]

Well that's largely due to the multiplatforms being developed with the 360s limitations in mind, I think most PS3 exclusives do take up a lot more room on the discs which is why they're so good XD

[kareem1_130]

ps3 is the console ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

---

Wrathchild68 wrote:

I had a PS1 and PS2 and of course  now a PS3. But over the last couple of months I got to say that I am becoming a bit annoyed with the PS3. For one, delays on store content. Everyone else in the world gets theirs before the EU. The actual connection to the PSN is not good, ok it is a free service, but if they improved it and made it subscription based I would pay for that.

A friend of mine got a 360 for xmas and he has no problems online like we do with the PS3. In fact we are lucky if we see him online now on his PS3. Makes you wonder doesn't it? Would you pay say £20-30 a year for an online service that worked? I know I would.

---

---

Wrathchild68 wrote:

I had a PS1 and PS2 and of course  now a PS3. But over the last couple of months I got to say that I am becoming a bit annoyed with the PS3. For one, delays on store content. Everyone else in the world gets theirs before the EU. The actual connection to the PSN is not good, ok it is a free service, but if they improved it and made it subscription based I would pay for that.

A friend of mine got a 360 for xmas and he has no problems online like we do with the PS3. In fact we are lucky if we see him online now on his PS3. Makes you wonder doesn't it? Would you pay say £20-30 a year for an online service that worked? I know I would.

---

---

Wrathchild68 wrote:

I had a PS1 and PS2 and of course  now a PS3. But over the last couple of months I got to say that I am becoming a bit annoyed with the PS3. For one, delays on store content. Everyone else in the world gets theirs before the EU. The actual connection to the PSN is not good, ok it is a free service, but if they improved it and made it subscription based I would pay for that.

A friend of mine got a 360 for xmas and he has no problems online like we do with the PS3. In fact we are lucky if we see him online now on his PS3. Makes you wonder doesn't it? Would you pay say £20-30 a year for an online service that worked? I know I would.

---

[davey23]

I've got 2009 on the phone, they want their thread back!

[MeanMrPringel]

well since I used to own both I can say which is better as I have played both so I think PS3 is because its better built more reliable. The online is free and is just a good as Xbox live although I still want Sony to do cross gane chat and the PS3 has so much more better esclusives.

[Wrathchild68]