on 12-02-2012 07:32 AM - last edited on 12-02-2012 07:33 AM
on 12-02-2012 08:06 AM
CinkCobra wrote:everything else damages it, so why not, i killed a hawk with the rifle from the middle of acid sea, as he flew over me and landed at there home base. Which i think is pretty stupid. With that said i still think hawks should be beefed up a bit when in mech mode, waaaaay to easy to kill.
And thats the problem we have!!!
Everything seems to do damage!!!!!
We should be getting away from the mind set of all our weapons should damage everything.....
Rocket launchers should be the only thing in a foot soldiers arsenal that kills a Hawk.....
As a Mech it should be rocket launchers , grenades or shoot the pilot......
The Sniper rifle should'nt be the all encompassing killer of the battle field......
We're already got a montage up of someone sniping & a lot of it being run & gun ......
We're getting to the stage again where we're going to be like every other game & the Sniper rifle will be the weapon of choice for the Slaughter Monsters amongst us because its too powerful .......
And no its not a Anti-Sniper rant ppl!!!!!
I love to sneak round the battlefield being a longrange killer......
on 12-02-2012 11:00 AM
on 12-02-2012 06:02 PM
Hogezz wrote:
You'll probably slate me for saying this next thing though ;-). I think only explosives and mounted mashine guns should be able to damage the yet to be released Tank though...
Slated NO.......
But i'm wondering where the mounted MG's are coming from?
As only the Razorback has one!!!!
I'm living in hope that by explosives you mean mines & rocket launcher rounds that both have explosive power?
on 12-02-2012 06:40 PM
you are useless as ever,
, do you live in a fantasy world ?Every one wants to make starhawk the best game it can be but you feel the need to talk like you have done something,
, you are an embarrassment, you provide no input to this game all you do is talk diarrhoea . You are nothing but a small child trying to be a big man its pathetic. So carry on with you're wild assumption. I find you hilarious can't stop laughing at you're comments
on 12-02-2012 08:20 PM
Leemco wrote:you are useless as ever,
, do you live in a fantasy world ?Every one wants to make starhawk the best game it can be but you feel the need to talk like you have done something,
, you are an embarrassment, you provide no input to this game all you do is talk diarrhoea . You are nothing but a small child trying to be a big man its pathetic. So carry on with you're wild assumption. I find you hilarious can't stop laughing at you're comments
![]()
Ahh Leemco wondered when you would pop your pathetic head above the parapet...
Its a FORUM this is what its for discusion you cretin.....
Its ppl like yourself how want every weapon to damage everything that ruin good games .......
on 13-02-2012 10:17 AM
on 13-02-2012 11:35 AM
on 13-02-2012 02:44 PM
Hogezz wrote:
But it's not really a problem if said vehicles took more damage. If the hitpoints aren't being increased, then it should stay as it is. I would rather they do some kind damage with higher hitpoints for the vehicles as well.
I still dont like the idea of the sniper rifle doing damage to everything.....
BUT....
If we have to have damage to vehicles its got to be targeted damage!!!!!
Its no good hitting the vehicle in the body it would just put holes in it......
So its got to be rounds into the engine compartment to damage/destroy it......
on 13-02-2012 04:20 PM



For the latest news and updates on what is happening in the PlayStation community, head over to our Announcements & Events forum.
To post a message, you will need to Sign In to the Forums using your PLAYSTATION®Network Sign In ID and password. If you do not yet have a PSN account, just click here to register.