28-05-2009 12:23 AM - edited 28-05-2009 12:24 AM
Thoughts, i mean being a first party game dont you think they could of taken more time with it
I no nd helped em with it but i bet if nd made it, it would probz not look washed out and rough GET READY TO BURRRRRRRRRN!!! also its on ps3 so they could of done a ton better look @ uncharted 2 that's not even out yet nd it look's a ton times better
on 28-05-2009 12:41 AM
oykottfird wrote:Thoughts, i mean being a first party game dont you think they could of taken more time with it
I no nd helped em with it but i bet if nd made it, it would probz not look washed out and rough GET READY TO BURRRRRRRRRN!!! also its on ps3 so they could of done a ton better look @ uncharted 2 that's not even out yet nd it look's a ton times better
Message Edited by oykottfird on 28-05-2009 12:24 AM
i guess by nd you mean naughty dog? anyway yes i kind of agree that some object dont render quick enough from afar, however considering the size and scale of the city it aint the worse i've seen by a long way. Also i think that the washed out and rough look is a style choice by sucker punch so it;s up to personal opinion (I like it anyway)
hope this thread doesnt go to down hill
rugby200
on 28-05-2009 12:51 AM
on 28-05-2009 02:33 AM
on 28-05-2009 02:49 AM
on 28-05-2009 07:52 AM
on 28-05-2009 08:33 AM
oderlessmoss wrote:
How can you compare an open world game, to when it comes down to it a very direct game. With not much room. inFamous for me is all about the solid game play, and the brilliant story.
Exactly.
Gameplay > Graphics.
on 28-05-2009 11:21 AM
Website ©2013 Sony Computer Entertainment Europe
All content, game titles, trade names and/or trade dress, trademarks, artwork and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. [more info]